| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Evidence for heat losses via party wall cavities in masonry constructionComplex Built Environment Systems Group, University College London, London, UK, robert.lowe{at}ucl.ac.uk
Buildings and Sustainability Group, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK
Buildings and Sustainability Group, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK
Buildings and Sustainability Group, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK This paper presents empirical evidence and analysis that supports the existence of a significant heat loss mechanism resulting from air movement through cavities in party walls in masonry construction. A range of heat loss experiments were undertaken as part of the Stamford Brook housing field trial in Altrincham in the United Kingdom. Co-heating tests showed a large discrepancy between the predicted and measured whole house heat loss coefficients. Analysis of the co-heating results, along with internal temperature data, thermal imaging and a theoretical analysis indicated that the most likely explanation for the discrepancy was bypassing of the thermal insulation via the uninsulated party wall cavities. The data show that such a bypass mechanism is potentially the largest single contributor to heat loss in terraced dwellings built to the 2006 revision of the Building Regulations. A comparable convective heat bypass associated with masonry party walls was identified in the late 1970s during the course of the Twin Rivers Project in the United States, albeit in a somewhat different construction from that used at Stamford Brook. A similar effect was also reported in the United Kingdom in the mid 1990s. However, it appears that no action was taken at that time either to confirm the results, to develop any technical solutions, or to amend standards for calculating heat losses from buildings. Current conventions for heat loss calculations in the United Kingdom do not take account of heat losses associated with party walls and it is suggested by the authors that such conventions may need to be updated to take account of the effect described in this paper. In the final part of the paper, the authors propose straightforward solutions to prevent bypassing of roof insulation via party walls by for example filling the cavity of the party wall with mineral fibre insulation, or by inserting a cavity closer across the cavity in the plane of the roof insulation. Practical application: The heat bypass mechanism described in this paper is believed by the authors to contribute to a significant proportion of heat loss from buildings in the UK constructed with clear cavities such as those found in separating walls between cavity masonry dwellings. It is proposed that relatively simple design changes could be undertaken to eliminate such heat loss pathways from new buildings. In addition, simple and cost effective measures are envisaged that could be used to minimise or eliminate the bypass from existing buildings. Such an approach could give rise to a significant reduction in carbon emissions from UK housing. a The Department for Communities and Local Government, previously the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, ODPM. References produced before the change of name are listed under ODPM. b Difficulties in the recruitment of households have delayed the long term monitoring programme to 2007 but, fortuitously, this has provided the capacity for a more detailed investigation of the party wall heat loss issues discussed in this paper with further co-heating tests (incorporating a more detailed measurements) planned for the winter of 2006/07. c A co-heating test involves electrically heating the inside of a house to a constant temperature over a period of several weeks. Correlation of the measured electrical heat input with external temperature and solar insolation then allows an estimation of the total dwelling heat loss coefficient. d House A is an end-of-terrace house with one adjacent house. House E is a mid-terrace house with two adjacent houses, D and F. e In the UK, the regulations consist of a broadly framed, performance based, legal requirement supported by detailed technical guidance on compliance. Such guidance is provided by a system of approved documents issued by the Secretary of State. The current methodology for dwelling heat loss calculations is contained in the Standard Assessment Procedure 200512 which is invoked by regulation 17A and Approved Document L1A.2 f The Building Regulations do limit the leakage of air from within each dwelling into the cavity through an overall limit on dwelling permeability. g The higher-than-normal inside-outside temperature difference during the co-heating tests implies that background ventilation rates and ventilation heat loss coefficients during these tests are likely to have exceeded those in the table. Calculations based on a semi-analytical model of air flow14 suggest that the increase is of the order of 3 WK—1 (10%) for the two-storey house A and 15 WK—1 (27%) for the three-storey house E.
h Note that the correction is only used to improve the graphical presentation of the data. The heat loss coefficient is calculated directly from multiple regression of heating power against References
Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, Vol. 28, No. 2,
161-181 (2007)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
T and S.